LFAR answering notes, the ten questions that are always answered badly
A single format from the Bank Audits: Statutory Central, Branch and LFAR pack. Annex II, branch auditors.
- 6 pages
- 5
- Word and PDF
- 13 September 2026
What it covers
- 1LFAR answering notes, the ten questions that are always answered badlyAnnex II, branch auditors
Read the opening
The first part of the format, as it downloads. Blanks are highlighted.
Standing instruction to managers and seniors on branch audits
Every LFAR answer must state what we did, how much we looked at, and what we found. An answer of "Yes", "No", "Satisfactory" or "No adverse features noticed" is returned by the review partner unsigned. Where the answer genuinely is that nothing was found, say what was examined so that the reader can judge the negative. Every answer carries a working paper reference.
# | The question, in substance | The answer that is useless | The answer that works |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Credit appraisal. Has the branch complied with the bank's procedures and instructions on loan applications, preparation of proposals for grant, renewal and enhancement of limits, and the appraisal documentation? | "Yes, the branch has generally complied." | "We examined the appraisal files of 18 borrowal accounts (14 above Rs 1 crore, aggregating Rs 34.2 crore, being 41% of the Branch's funded exposure; 4 selected at random below Rs 1 crore). Deficiencies: in 5 cases (list at WP A-3.2) the credit rating sheet was not signed by the rating authority; in 3 cases the CIBIL report on file predated the sanction by more than 6 months; in 2 cases (accounts [x] and [y], Rs 2.8 crore) audited financial statements of the borrower for the latest year were not on file and the appraisal was on provisional figures." |
2 | Sanction and disbursement. Have credit facilities been sanctioned beyond the delegated authority of the branch, and were such cases promptly reported to higher authorities? | "No such instances noticed." | "We reconciled every sanction made during the year (report [name], 212 sanctions, Rs 46.8 crore) to the delegation of powers circular dated [date]. Two sanctions exceeded the Branch Manager's authority: account [x], Rs 55 lakh against an authority of Rs 40 lakh, reported to the Regional Office on [date], 41 days after sanction against the required 7 days; account [y], Rs 30 lakh, confirmed by the Regional Office on [date] before disbursement. Disbursement in account [x] preceded the confirmation." |
More in Audit & Assurance
Tax Audit: Section 44AB Today, Section 63 Tomorrow
Download ₹499Fill online ₹649Form 3CD clause control sheet, the fifteen that matter
Download ₹149Fill online ₹199GST: Annual Return, GSTR-9C and Departmental Audits
Download ₹349Fill online ₹499Engagement letter and documentation index, transfer pricing, Form 3CEB
Download ₹149Fill online ₹199